"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely"

Power Corrupts

Shakespeare's Macbeth

Kayla Christine Steward

November 16, 2014

This statement, "Power corrupts, but absolute power corrupts absolutely", brings light to the thought of power having the ability to contaminate or ruin one's mental/physical being through their beliefs, actions, personality, and morals. As soon as one lets power into their life, if they don't have self-control and have the ability to stay humble despite the advantages they may have, it can control them and eventually take over them. Though, does it depend on how sane one is? How insane someone is?





https://www.flickr.com/photos/57037724@N03/8207444408/

In this picture, David Brin uses part of the original quote of "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely", but it goes further on to say "It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things than power". This quote can easily lead viewers to question, was Macbeth insane? He wanted to be powerful, and he was willing to do anything to receive it. "And such an instrument I was to use. Mine eyes are made the fools o' th' other sense or else worth all the rest" (Macbeth, 2.1) In this quote Macbeth was talking about his vision of the bloody dagger that he was going to use to kill King Duncan in the play, Macbeth is constantly going back and forth with himself on whether or not to kill King Duncan. Of course, he supports the original quote by doing the evil deed in order to get what he wants-power.
Macbeth may or may not have been completely insane before, but the greed and thirst for power took over him and pushed him to do something completely immoral.
We face this within ourselves everyday. Every day we are constantly battling the evil within inside us all. Some of us are strong enough and willing enough to fight for the good to keep coming out and for the evil to stay hidden and away, but, unfortuneatly, some of us lose our battles. Some of us become so tired of fighting that we just let the greed and thirst for something we want so bad in our lives and the will to do whatever it takes to get it, takes over. It consumes us. That being said, was Macbeth consumed by his thirst for power? Or was he just tired of constantly fighting his battle?

An Unintentional "Deadly Sin"

France, April 1999. Moet Hennessy

An Unintentional "Deadly Sin" 

By: Kayla Steward

Deadly Sin: Gluttony

 Imagine you are flipping through a magazine and you happen to come across this advertisement. You see the young woman eating what seems to be a handful of cherries. You then look down at the purse that is next to her and see it is also filled with cherries that have rolled out onto the table she is resting on. You don't think twice about what's in the picture, but you do wonder what the picture is advertising. Louis Voutton. Most likely, you will think for a second about how the product of the ad and the ad relate, but then you'll continue to flip through the magazine.

Now go through the whole analysis process of the ad just like you did in the first scenario, except take a longer moment to think more about what is indirect, rather than what is directly seen within the picture. Not only take a moment to go into deeper thought, but think through a religious perspective. You then realize that this ad is revealing something most people won't catch on their first glimpse- a sin. A deadly sin. Gluttony, to be more specific.

 Gluttony is the sin of over eating. In the picture, the woman is clearly eating more than enough of the cherries. The author is most likely trying to appeal to an audience who will think more about the ad just like you did in the second scenario. They show a woman over eating out of a nice purse to most likely get viewers to want to over-buy their products. They want them to constantly want their products, just like the woman wants the fruit within the picture. The author is most likely trying to appeal to an audience of women that fall in the higher middle class to upper class, just because the company of the ad is an expensive company and they are advertising a woman's purse. This audience of women most likely includes women who wear expensive clothing and are going to want to buy the purse to keep their reputation of being able to afford and wear expensive clothing. The downside to this ad, keeping the audience in mind, is that it can come off as a bit stereotypical. Men can have gluttony and can have the desire to be stylish and buy expensive things, but since it is your typical women's purse, they choose to have a woman wearing nice clothing. This can also be stereotypical towards women as well, making them seem greedy, or avarice in the fact that they want people to notice they are able to buy and pull off such expensive brand items. The ad is meant to make the audience want to buy their product, without even thinking about the effects it will have on it's audience, nor the image they are sending to the viewers of the ad, which in my opinion, is not a very good image. But my opinion is my opinion. I personally would not buy a purse that expensive, especially for a company that is possibly biased towards other social classes that are not within their intentions.

 

Freebie

Freebie

 Othering Our Society

http://photos.wingyounghuie.com/p709406511/h7651beea#h7651beea

(The picture didn't have a description,  nor did it allow me to copy and paste the picture. So here is a hyperlink for the picture I used for my blog post!)

Picture this scenario in your mind, just for a moment. You wake up one morning and look at yourself in the mirror. You realize that you need a haircut so you decide to head over to the local barber shop to get a trim. As you walk into the barber shop, you see a man, most likely middle-aged, getting a haircut. You notice the content he has on his face as the barber, in deep focus, buzzes each little follicle of hair off of his head, one by one. You raise an opinion in your head of how the barber is buzzing his hair off and you then form your own opinion as to whether or not the work the barber is doing on the man’s head is nicely done. As you’re walking past, you then hesitate. Before continuing your walk, you stop and notice the sign the man is holding. You read the sign and speak the words aloud in your head, “I am a far minded person. I wish the world would do the same”. You ponder on this quote and you think not of the reason the man is holding the sign, but you think of the reason as to why the sign he is holding has those two sentences scrawled onto it. You take a few moments to yourself to think on it, and continue your walk to an open chair, because you know you will probably never see that specific man, holding that specific sign, with those specific words scrawled onto it, ever again. 

Now go through the entire scenario again and actually focus on the man and the words on the sign he is holding. It is almost as if he is a representation of an everyday "other". An average "other" getting a haircut and not having the ability to speak his mind, so he is left to writing it on a chalk board and wearing it on his chest. "I am a far minded person. I wish the world would do the same". You realize that this quote is not only representing his loss of the ability to speak his mind, but the fact that someone who isn't able to speak their mind sure has a lot to offer the world with their words. The man's sign is saying I may not be talking, but that doesn't mean I don't have anything to say. At least that is what you infer the man is trying to tell people reading the sign. You realize how amazing it is to see the way society restricts some of the most wise and understanding people in the world, and gives them the label "others" just because they don't necessarily always have the same opinion as we do. We give these people titles in society to make them feel like outsiders and useless to the world so we can make ourselves seem better than we really are. We are no better than anyone if we continue to give people labels just because we aren't always on the same page with each other. If we continue to single people out and alienate them, we will never be able to see outside of our own perspectives. In other words, well never know color in world that is just white and black.

Huie and Atwood both show their perspective of the “others” in similar ways. They make the people feel and seem bigger than they truly feel. They give them a reason to speak up and speak their mind. They give them not only ears to listen, or a mouth to speak, but a heart to tell them what to say, and a brain to tell them when to say it. When they are given the opportunity to speak their mind, they speak as they please. They give us insight to how they are feeling and what their opinions are of certain things. They help us see through perspectives other than our own, even if they aren’t as big as the ones we view society through on a daily basis. They give us an insight on the troubles and tribulations they have faced, but also the pleasant memories and experiences they’ve shared with others.  In The Handmaid’s Tale they are considered the “others”, but in our society, they are viewed as “friends”, “family”,  “us”, “we”, “the people”. We are far minded people because we are shown what it is like to be so far from hope, that we might as well give in and give up. We are far minded people not because we don’t stand out above everybody, but because we are able to see through the world through perspectives farther than our eyes can even manage to see. They may be called the “others”, but who they are, and what they have to offer the world, is far more important and meaningful than the societal labels given to them.